Consultation
Strategy
What is the first step in an evaluation?
Imagine if you could accurately assess the true value of your property right from the start. Sounds good? The key lies in the first step. This article shows you how to master this step and lay a solid foundation for your valuation. Need professional support? Contact us for a no-obligation consultation.
The first step in an assessment is the precise clarification of the assignment to avoid misunderstandings and to establish the framework for the entire assessment.
A comprehensive data collection and the correct choice of assessment method are crucial for accurate results and can reduce the risk of bad investments by up to 12%.
Objectivity and compliance with legal requirements are essential to ensure the credibility of the report and minimise liability risks.
Fundamentals for Successful Report Preparation
An expert report serves as a well-founded decision-making aid and is based on the careful assessment of a contentious issue by a specialist. This process begins with defining and understanding the commission. The quality and persuasiveness of a report largely depend on the precision with which the first step – clarifying the commission – is executed. Clear commission clarification ensures that all parties have a common understanding of the issues to be examined and that the specialist comprehensively considers the relevant aspects. The definition and purpose of an expert report are therefore closely linked to the first step.
The Relevance of the First Step
The first step is crucial as it sets the framework for the entire evaluation. Unclear or erroneous commission clarification can lead to significant deviations and inaccuracies in the subsequent process. This can not only impair the quality of the report but also lead to costly wrong decisions. Precise commission clarification, on the other hand, enables the specialist to efficiently gather relevant information and select appropriate evaluation methods. The key steps are thus clearly defined from the outset.
Article Overview: What to Expect
In this article, we will analyse in detail what the first step in an evaluation is and how you can avoid common mistakes. We provide practical tips and recommendations on how to lay the foundation for an accurate and reliable property valuation. In doing so, we will cover the importance of commission clarification, the analysis of the court ruling (if applicable), and the delineation of the investigation framework. This article is aimed at both experts and clients who wish to develop a solid understanding of the evaluation process. The operation of the evaluation process is explained here in detail.
Clarification of the Assignment in Detail
The assignment clarification is the central pillar of any professional assessment. It is about developing a clear and comprehensive understanding of the assignment to ensure all parties are on the same page. This includes the precise definition of the questions to be answered, the setting of the objectives to be achieved, and the identification of the relevant framework conditions. An unclearly defined assignment can lead to misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and ultimately an erroneous assessment. The process of an expert report is heavily dependent on the assignment clarification.
What is the precise assignment?
To define the assignment precisely, you should ask yourself the following questions: What specific questions need to be answered? What goals are to be achieved with the assessment? What type of expert report is required (e.g., court-proof report or private report)? What specific requirements or constraints exist? A detailed examination of these questions helps to determine the scope and depth of the required analysis. The requirements for a court-proof report are particularly high.
Analysis of the Evidence Order
In judicial disputes, the evidence order plays a central role. It determines the scope and nature of the evidence procedure and serves as a guideline for the expert. It is of paramount importance to carefully analyse the evidence order and ensure that the report answers all the questions and requirements contained within it fully and accurately. Deviations from the evidence order can lead to the rejection of the report. The preparation of a report requires strict adherence to the evidence order.
What is an evidence order?
An evidence order is a court decree that specifies the scope and type of evidence procedure in a legal case. It generally contains detailed questions that the expert is expected to answer and instructions for conducting the assessment. The expert must strictly adhere to the evidence order and must not answer questions not contained in the evidence order. Otherwise, they risk their report being dismissed as inadmissible. Decision-making within the framework of an evidence order requires the utmost care.
Delineation of the Examination Framework
The delineation of the examination framework is another important aspect of assignment clarification. It involves determining which documents and information are relevant for the assessment and which aspects are irrelevant and should be excluded. A clear delineation of the examination framework helps focus on the essential points and avoid unnecessary research and analyses. The next steps depend on a clear delineation.
What is part of the examination framework?
To clearly delineate the examination framework, you should ask yourself the following questions: What documents and information are required for the assessment (e.g., land register extracts, building plans, rental agreements)? What geographical or temporal restrictions exist? Which specific aspects of the object or matter are significant? Which aspects are irrelevant and should be excluded? Careful answering of these questions helps define the scope of the data collection and analysis required. A comprehensive guide to writing reports emphasizes the importance of structuring.
Comprehensive Data Collection
A comprehensive data collection is the foundation of any well-founded evaluation. It involves gathering all relevant information necessary for assessing the object or matter at hand. This includes not only obvious data such as property size and location, but also detailed information about the condition of the object, the market situation, and legal frameworks. An incomplete or inaccurate data collection can lead to significant inaccuracies in the report. The expert reports require careful data collection.
What data is required?
The type of data required depends greatly on the specific object of evaluation and the particular assignment. In general, the following data is relevant: property data (e.g., land register extract, site plan), building data (e.g., construction plans, building description, energy certificate), market data (e.g., comparative prices, rent index, market analysis reports), legal frameworks (e.g., development plan, monument protection regulations) and other relevant information (e.g., suspected contamination, construction defects). Property valuation requires specific data.
Methods of Data Collection
There are various methods to collect the required data. A mandatory on-site inspection is essential to get a complete picture of the object's condition. Additionally, document reviews (e.g., construction plans, rental agreements) and the use of databases (e.g., land registry office, cadastral office) can provide valuable information. Interviewing relevant individuals (e.g., owners, tenants, administrators) can also be helpful in obtaining additional information. The strategy in data collection is crucial.
How is the data collected?
Data collection generally takes place in several steps. Initially, publicly accessible data (e.g., land register extract, cadastral map) is obtained. Then the on-site inspection follows, where the object is examined in detail and photographed. Subsequently, relevant documents (e.g., construction plans, rental contracts) are reviewed and, if necessary, further information is gathered from relevant persons. The collected data is then systematically recorded and evaluated. The Wikipedia page on expert reports provides a good overview.
Ensuring Data Quality
The quality of the collected data is crucial for the accuracy of the report. It is important to carefully check the data for accuracy and completeness. Contradictory or incomplete data should be questioned and, if necessary, corrected or supplemented. Existing reports (e.g., audit reports) should also be critically evaluated and supplemented by own research if necessary. The liability of the expert is an important aspect.
How is data quality ensured?
To ensure the quality of data, the following measures should be taken: Verify the data for plausibility and consistency. Compare the data with other available information. Question contradictory or incomplete data. Conduct your own research to validate the data. Document all steps of data collection and verification transparently. The most important steps in ensuring data quality are crucial.
Overview of Appraisal Methods
The selection of appropriate appraisal methods is a crucial step in the valuation process. There are various methods that are suitable depending on the type of asset, specific situation, and the availability of data. The most common appraisal methods are the comparative value method, the income value method, and the cost approach method. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages and is more suitable for certain use cases than others. The choice of method is critical for a legally sound valuation report.
What appraisal methods are available?
The comparative value method is based on comparing the asset to be valued with similar assets that have been sold recently. The income value method is based on determining the future earnings that the asset is expected to generate. The cost approach method is based on determining the value of the individual components of the asset (e.g. land, building) and then adding them together. The functioning of the appraisal process includes selecting the appropriate method.
Criteria for Selection
The selection of the appropriate appraisal method depends on various criteria. The type of asset (e.g. apartment, house, commercial property), the specific situation (e.g. sale, loan collateral, inheritance), and the availability of data play an important role. Legal frameworks (e.g. ImmoWertV) also need to be considered. A careful analysis of these criteria helps in selecting the most suitable method. Making decisions in method selection requires expertise.
What criteria are relevant?
Relevant criteria include: The type of asset (e.g. apartment, house, commercial property), the specific situation (e.g. sale, loan collateral, inheritance), data availability (e.g. comparative prices, rent index), legal frameworks (e.g. ImmoWertV), and the individual needs of the client. The procedure of an appraisal includes justifying the choice of method.
Justification of Method Choice
It is important to document and justify the choice of appraisal method transparently. The appraiser should explain why he has chosen a particular method and which criteria he has taken into account. A comprehensible justification enhances the credibility of the valuation report and helps to avoid misunderstandings. The guide for writing valuation reports emphasizes the importance of justification.
Why was this method chosen?
The justification of method choice should be detailed and comprehensible. The appraiser should explain what the advantages and disadvantages of the chosen method are and why it is the most suitable in the given situation. He should also discuss alternative methods and explain why these were not chosen. The Wikipedia page on expert appraisal reports offers more information.
Avoiding Bias
Objectivity and impartiality are essential prerequisites for a credible and reliable evaluation. An expert must not be influenced by personal interests, relationships, or prejudices. Any form of bias can impact the objectivity of the report and undermine its credibility. Avoiding bias is a key aspect of report creation.
What does bias mean?
Bias occurs when an expert is unable to carry out an objective and impartial evaluation due to personal interests, relationships, or prejudices. This can happen, for instance, if the expert is related to or friends with one of the parties, has a financial interest in the outcome of the evaluation, or already holds a preconceived opinion on the matter. The crucial steps for avoiding bias are essential.
Neutrality in Presentation
Even if an expert is objective, the impression of bias can arise if the presentation of the report is not neutral. Therefore, it is important to use objective language, avoid personal opinions, and consider all relevant facts, even if they contradict one's own views. A neutral presentation enhances the credibility of the report. The Guide to Writing Reports emphasises the importance of neutrality.
How is neutrality ensured?
To ensure neutrality, you should take the following measures: Use objective and precise language. Avoid personal opinions and judgments. Consider all relevant facts, even if they contradict your own views. Document all steps of the evaluation in a transparent and understandable manner. The functioning of the evaluation process requires neutrality.
Adhering to Ethical Guidelines
Experts are obliged to adhere to ethical guidelines designed to ensure their objectivity and impartiality. These guidelines typically include avoiding conflicts of interest, maintaining confidentiality, and adhering to quality standards. Adhering to ethical guidelines significantly contributes to the credibility of the report. The Expert Reports require adherence to ethical guidelines.
Which ethical guidelines are relevant?
The relevant ethical guidelines include: Avoiding conflicts of interest, maintaining confidentiality, adhering to quality standards, ensuring transparency of evaluation methods, and independence from third-party instructions. Making decisions in line with ethical guidelines is crucial.
Systematic Structuring
A systematic structure is essential for the comprehensibility and traceability of an expert report. The report should be divided into logical sections that reflect the evaluation process. A clear structure makes it easier for the reader to follow the expert's reasoning and understand the results of the evaluation. The guide to writing reports emphasises the importance of structuring.
How should the report be structured?
The structure of the report depends on the type of report. For legal reports, structuring according to thesis, facts, subsumption, and conclusion is common. For factual reports, structuring according to case presentation, evaluation, and summary is appropriate. Regardless of the type of report, a clear and comprehensible outline should be chosen. The functioning of the evaluation process should be reflected in the structure.
Transparent Documentation
Transparent documentation is crucial to ensure the traceability and credibility of the report. All data, methods, assumptions, and results should be documented in detail. The documentation should be designed so that a third party is able to understand the evaluation and verify the results. The documentation is essential for a report that stands up in court.
What needs to be documented?
All data (e.g., property data, building data, market data), all evaluation methods used, all assumptions made, and all results obtained must be documented. The documentation should be so detailed that a third party can understand the evaluation and verify the results. The documentation serves to safeguard the expert.
Clear Language
An expert report should be written in clear and understandable language. Technical jargon should be avoided or explained. The report should be formulated in a way that allows non-experts to understand the expert's reasoning. Clear language contributes to the credibility of the report. The Wikipedia page on expert reports provides further information.
How to make the report understandable?
To make an expert report understandable, you should take the following measures: Use clear and precise language. Avoid technical jargon or explain it. Formulate the argumentation comprehensibly. Use examples and illustrations to clarify complex issues. The key steps to clarity are crucial.
Compliance with Legal Requirements
When preparing an expert report, various legal requirements must be considered. These requirements ensure the quality and objectivity of the report and protect the rights of the parties involved. Failure to comply with legal requirements can lead to liability claims against the expert. The legal requirements are crucial for an expert report that is fit for court.
What legal requirements are relevant?
Relevant legal requirements include: The Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), standards for expert evidence, the ImmoWertV (for property valuations), and the respective professional regulations for experts. The legal foundations are an important aspect of preparing a report.
Liability Risks
Experts are exposed to numerous liability risks. These risks particularly arise when the report is incorrect or violates legal requirements. In the event of an error, the expert can be held liable for any damages incurred. The liability of the expert is a significant aspect.
What liability risks exist?
Liability risks include: Errors in the report, breaches of care duties, breaches of confidentiality obligations, and failure to comply with legal requirements. The crucial steps to avoid liability risks are fundamental.
Avoiding Liability Claims
To avoid liability claims, experts should take several measures. These include: Working diligently, maintaining transparent documentation, complying with legal requirements, and obtaining professional liability insurance. The functioning of the valuation process should be carefully documented.
How can liability claims be avoided?
To avoid liability claims, you should take the following measures: Work diligently and conscientiously. Document all steps of the valuation process transparently and understandably. Adhere to legal requirements. Take out professional liability insurance. Making decisions in line with legal requirements is crucial.
Key Insights of the Article
This article has explored the significance of the first step in an evaluation. We have shown that careful clarification of the assignment, comprehensive data collection, and informed method selection are crucial for the success of the expert report. We also highlighted the importance of objectivity, impartiality, and adherence to legal requirements. The process of an expert report heavily depends on the clarification of the assignment.
What are the key findings?
The key findings are: The first step in an evaluation is crucial. Careful clarification of the assignment, comprehensive data collection, and informed method selection are essential. Objectivity, impartiality, and adherence to legal requirements are of great importance. The guide to writing expert reports provides further information.
Outlook on Future Developments
The evaluation industry is subject to constant change. Innovations in valuation technology, new legal requirements, and changing market conditions present experts with new challenges. Therefore, it is important to continuously educate oneself and adapt to new conditions. The Wikipedia page on expert reports offers a good overview.
What trends can be expected?
Expected trends include: Increasing digitisation of evaluation processes, increased use of artificial intelligence, introduction of new legal requirements, and growing importance of sustainability aspects. Key steps to adapt to new trends are crucial.
Recommendations for Action
Experts and clients should take the following recommendations into account: Prepare thoroughly for the evaluation. Communicate transparently and openly with each other. Adhere to ethical guidelines. Continue to educate yourself. The recommendations for action are crucial for a legally sound expert report.
What should experts and clients consider?
Experts should prepare thoroughly for the evaluation, communicate transparently, adhere to ethical guidelines, and continue their education. Clients should inform themselves in advance about the requirements of an evaluation, clearly define the assignment, and provide the expert with all relevant information. Want to determine the value of your property precisely? Contact us here to arrange a non-binding consultation. We are happy to support you in taking the first step towards a successful evaluation.
Are you planning a property valuation and want to ensure everything is done right from the start? Auctoa supports you with cutting-edge technology and comprehensive expertise. Avoid costly mistakes and lay the foundation for a successful property valuation. Auctoa is revolutionising the valuation of properties and land through the use of state-of-the-art automation and AI-powered, human expertise to deliver precise, certified, and market-relevant valuations.
Our fully automated valuation platforms, hybrid AI-human assessments, and digital market analyses provide you with the highest valuation accuracy through the latest AI, lightning-fast automated processes, and real-time market data integration. The seamless fusion of digital innovation and human expertise guarantees you precise and rapid determination of the true property value.
Contact us today to learn more about our services and how we can assist you with your property valuation. Secure your personalised consultation now and embark on a successful future with Auctoa!Get in touch now!
On Wikipedia you can find a general definition and explanation on the topic of expert reports.
svb-boehmer.de describes the typical procedure of a report and the associated steps.
certa-gutachten.de explains the special requirements that must be met for a court-proof report.
di-vis.com offers insights into the preparation of reports by tax advisors.
gwriters.de provides guidance on writing reports and emphasizes the importance of structure.
On the experten.de page, you will find a lexicon with information on expert reports.
What is the first step in a property valuation?
The first step is the clarification of the assignment. Here, the specific questions and objectives of the valuation are defined to ensure that all parties have a common understanding.
Why is the clarification of the assignment so important?
An unclear clarification of the assignment can lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations, which affect the quality of the valuation. A precise clarification lays the foundation for a reliable valuation.
What is an evidence order and what role does it play?
An evidence order is a court order that specifies the scope and nature of the evidence to be provided. The expert must adhere strictly to it to ensure the validity of the report.
What data is required for a comprehensive property valuation?
Required data includes property data (land register extract, site plan), building data (construction plans, building description), market data (comparative prices, rent index), and legal frameworks (development plan, monument protection).
What valuation methods exist and how do you choose the right one?
The most common methods are the comparative value method, the income value method, and the cost value method. The choice depends on the type of property, the situation, and the availability of data.
How to ensure objectivity in a property valuation?
Objectivity is ensured through the avoidance of bias, a neutral presentation, and the adherence to ethical guidelines. The expert must not be influenced by personal interests.
What legal aspects must be considered when drafting a report?
Various legal requirements must be observed, including the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), the standards for expert evidence, and the ImmoWertV. Non-compliance can lead to liability claims.
How can Auctoa assist in property valuation?
Auctoa revolutionises property valuation by employing automation and AI-supported human expertise to provide precise, certified, and market-driven valuations.
